Jeff Levy on Computers - KFI-AM 640

here to listen to nationally syndicated Jeff Levy's report on

March 15, 2002 - KFI-AM 640

Back to top

Rush is on to offer films, TV on request, via cable and the Internet - Montreal Gazette

By: Andy Riga

It's a couch potato's dream: watch movies and television shows when you want to - not at times decided by network or pay-per-view programmers.

Cable companies have talked up so-called video-on-demand services for years - and now say they're finally getting ready to deliver, spooked by the defection of tens of thousands of customers to satellite-TV rivals.

For its part, Hollywood, worried about being blindsided by the same massive online lawlessness that hit record companies, is working on its own Internet-based VOD services.

My online film festival began at MovieFlix, a legal, 3-year-old site where you pay $5 U.S. per month for access to 2,300 titles. "It's desktop entertainment," says Robert Moskovits, co-founder of the Los-Angeles-based site, which boasts 5,000 paying members.

Using a high-speed Vidéotron Internet connection, I watched several movies and a Burns & Allen show. Picture quality isn't nearly as crisp as TV, but still watchable. Expanded onto a TV set, the images become fuzzier.

The site is packed with older material whose copyright has expired, along with B-movies and TV shows that it has licensed. Included are 15 Charlie Chaplin shorts. My eye was caught by a 1954 Vittorio De Sica film set in Rome's Termini train station, starring Montgomery Clift. Another movie, Creature From the Haunted Sea, a 1960 horror satire set in post-revolution Cuba was another favorite of mine.

It isn't a cable-TV replacement, Moskovits says. "Most members have cable and TV sets, but they also have (high-speed Internet) connections and this is just a fun way to get some entertainment on their computers."

Users don't download the movies. Instead, they are "streamed" - fed to the user as it is viewed. The Internet is "certainly not a perfect medium, but it's improving," Moskovits says, and is an ideal medium for VOD because "it's available everywhere in the world, there's a payment method in place, and it's secure." Since viewers don't download the movie, they can't copy it.

February 20, 2002 - Montreal Gazette

Back to top

Web Files with Mike Goldfein - KING-TV, Seattle, WA NBC

here to watch nationally syndicated tech reporter Mike Goldfein's feature on Mike's piece was featured in the following cities, KHOU-TV CH 11 (CBS) Television Houston, WVEC-TV CH 11 (ABC) Television Virgina, KVUE-TV CH 24 (ABC) Television Austin as well as Phoenix.

January 29, 2002 - KING-TV, Seattle

Back to top

For Couch Potatoes, the Web Delivers - New York Times

By: Neil McManus

Cable television executives have been promising video-on-demand for years. Somebody should tell them it is already here.

The other night I hooked audio-video cables from my PC to my television. Then my wife, Emily, and I sat on our sofa and watched full-screen, full-motion videos through our broadband Internet connection. Although far from DVD quality, they looked and sounded as if we were watching regular old television.

Why get video through the Internet when you have hundreds of channels on cable or satellite TV? One reason is the difference between a lot of choices and a staggering number of choices.

On Yahoo, I can watch the 1974 title fight between Muhammad Ali and George Foreman, the Rumble in the Jungle. Pausing it with a click of the mouse, I can go to ( and choose a "Dragnet" episode. At MovieFlix categories on the site include horror, B westerns, martial arts, silent and literature. Think TBS collides with A&E.

Hooking our new Compaq PC to our 10-year-old television set took some work, but it turned viewing Net videos into a social experience. You don't need to take this step to watch video full-screen on your PC monitor, but you will need a relatively powerful PC. Most video-on-demand sites also support newer-model Macs as long as they have the latest Web browsers and the latest version of RealPlayer, QuickTime or Windows Media Player.

The videos at the sites we visit (music videos, shorts, television shows and vintage movies) are not pirated, but most are free. (Yahoo Broadcast and iFilm, however, will make you sit through commercials before you view a video.)

To some, all this may seem like taking a vast wasteland to new extremes. But for video devotees, it is a glimpse of a promised land where you have the ultimate in control over what you watch at any moment.

As studios, cable and satellite companies and video stores continue to duke it out, the battles over what to watch at our house no longer center on the remote control. They are now fights for the mouse.

January 3, 2002 - New York Times

Back to top

Free Movie Access - KTLA 5 Los Angeles Morning News

here to watch KTLA's Cyber Guy, Kurt Knutsson as he features Kurt names a Hot Site of the day.

December 14, 2001 - KTLA 5 Los Angeles Morning News

Back to top

A Half-Million Users & Growing - California Technology

How is Beating the Odds

By: Phillip W. Browne

When the bottom fell out of the Nasdaq and technology companies began failing in droves, online entertainment firms were among those hit especially hard.

The dotcom bloodbath included companies like Santa Monica’s Digital Entertainment Network, and the Steven Spielberg-backed, whose obituary was written before the venture saw the light of day.

They blamed their demise, in large part, on the fact that eyeballs just weren’t there and that the current global telecommunications infrastructure couldn’t handle streaming media content. By their accounts, they were companies before their time.

It’s no small wonder, then, that a scrappy Hollywood streaming media company is not only surviving, but thriving.

Now three years old - an eternity in technology years - houses more than 2,300 full-length films in its online database. Content includes Hollywood classics, independent films, short films and television shows, and the soft porn of Erotic Survivor.

And last month, reached a milestone once considered impossible in its space: It logged more than a half-million registered users. Proof that the time for streaming media is here and now, not a concept for the next generation of technophiles, said the company’s co-founder, Robert Moskovits.

"We weren’t a part of dotcom excess, throwing lavish parties and hiring hundreds of employees while draining venture money," said Moskovits, who is also the company’s director of communications. "In fact we didn’t take any venture money at all. That’s why we’re still around and that’s why you don’t see our company listed on f*"

Elbow Grease

Just take a look at’s corporate structure: Moskovits - alongside CEO and cofounder, Opher Mizrahi - run the entire operation, encoding all of the video themselves at their headquarters, a house in a Hollywood. Other than that, the firm employs a bank of servers that do the rest.

Early streaming media companies were "competing with each other for nobody," and were spending top-dollar to create original content, Moskovits said. Not MovieFlix.

"We never had to spend major cash on our library since a lot of it is in the public domain," Moskovits said. "Streaming media is a viable business of today. There was no lack of consumer interest for companies that failed. Bad management and overspending killed the other guys."

The company’s original revenue model was based on syndication deals with other portal sites like America Online, Yahoo!, and NBCi. But as would be expected, the cash flow has dwindled from those sources.

In response the company launched MovieFlix Plus - a $4.95-per-month subscription service that began in August that gives users access to premium content.

"I like to describe it as the type of content that you would see on a pay cable channel or satellite TV late at night," Moskovits said. "It’s not first-run feature films, but it’s definitely worth it."

Since August the company has registered 3,300 MovieFlix Plus paying members. That number is increasing at a rate of about 1,000 per month, Moskovits said. In total, the site serves close to 1 million streams per month.

They expect that number will rise this month when they are scheduled to ink a deal with Microsoft to allow them to stream in Windows Media format. Today all of the content is in RealPlayer format.

The duo isn’t ready to talk money quite yet, but Moskovits said they plan to break even in the first quarter of 2002. As for the future, plans to take the slow approach, growing organically as the company’s needs grow.

"That has been the best thing for us, taking it slow and adding what we need when we need it," Moskovits said. "We do it this way because we’ve learned from everyone else’s mistakes."

December 5, 2001 - California Technology

Back to top

1/2 Million Members Now Watching Full Length Movies on - Press Release

High Quality Movie Streaming and Best of Breed Content Draw Record Numbers to

Hollywood, CA (November 5, 2001) - MovieFlix (, the leading broadband movie provider on the Web, today announced that over 1/2 million registered members are now watching full length movies on Contributing to this strong membership growth is the popularity of the over 2300 broadband movie titles consisting of Hollywood classics, independent films, short films, television shows and more in over 30 popular categories as well as the high quality of movie streaming utilizing the popular Real Player format. Going forward MovieFlix will continue to expand its broadband movie library offering members the largest video on demand collection available anywhere on the web.

"We are extremely pleased about reaching the 1/2 million member milestone. The popularity of programming is a testament to our 'best in class' content and MovieFlix's unprecedented level of convenience and ease-of-use," says CEO and co-founder Opher Mizrahi.

November 5, 2001 - Press Release

Back to top

Start-Up Seeks Niche Amid Film Goliaths - Multichannel News

By: Karen Brown

This is 2001, and there are no lavish launch parties, foosball tables squatting in pricey San Francisco office space, phonebook-sized employee rosters or high-flying salaries.

In the new Internet reality, here's all you need to run a streaming video-on-demand movie site: A couple of 28-year-old guys, a bank of servers a place to call home. A house in Hollywood, to be specific.

That's the strategy behind, an outfit whose two-man employee roster has not changed since it was founded in 1998. The site offers about 2,200 full-length streaming media movies in 30 categories — everything from the vintage Roy Rogers-Dale Evans Western Apache Rose to the modern raunch of Erotic Survivor.

It also offers an example of post-Internet bust minimalism: CEO and cofounder Opher Mizrahi and partner Robert Moskovits run the entire operation, encoding all of the video themselves at their headquarters in a Hollywood house before sending it off to servers hosted at a Qwest Communications International Inc. data center.

These post-Internet-crash Davids won't have it easy in an online video distribution field filling up with Goliaths. But MovieFlix already counts about 400,000 registered users, racking up between 1,000 and 1,500 new members daily for its free service.

In August, the duo unveiled MovieFlix Plus, a monthly subscription service that offers unlimited viewing for $4.95 per month and averages 50 to 60 new members per day. In total, the site serves close to 1 million streams per month.

"The beauty of the Internet — which is what a lot of these other dot-coms failed to utilize — is that you should have these servers and computers do most of your work," Mizrahi said. "And you don't need dozens or hundreds of employees to basically run a Web site. You set up your servers correctly from day one, you do a lot of things in-house and you keep things at a normal pace, and you can survive."

To date, MovieFlix has relied on content-syndication deals with other portal sites — including America Online, Yahoo! Inc. and NBCi — for its revenue. But Mizrahi said that will change.

"Syndication basically started toward the end of the heyday of the dot-com mania. I mean, we were getting calls left and right from every Web site out there — portal, ISP, you name it," he said. "With the collapse of the dot-com economy in recent times, we've been getting a lot less calls for syndication service.

"We still have a lot of our core customers who have been with us for over a year now, and we continue to feed off that. However, that market is essentially drying up."

That's why MovieFlix Plus was created. Mizrahi expects to have about 6,000 paying customers by the end of the year. Within the next six months, he predicted, the subscription service will generate the bulk of the company's revenue.

He hopes the company will be in the black some time early 2002 — without any venture-capital support.

"We've had an opportunity to take venture financing; we've actually spoken to a couple," Mizrahi noted. "And it is kind of fortunate that we didn't go that route, because having taken venture money, we would not be around today. "We'd be just like every other company that received our million first round, $5 to $10 million second round, hired 500 employees, burned through all of that money in a year or less and with the economic downturn and the whole dot-com boom basically spiraling out of control downward, we just basically wouldn't have had enough money to survive."

Not that survival is guaranteed without big-money funding. Such a small operation faces big challenges and even bigger potential competitors.

Studio Ventures Bloom

With recent news of the Goliath Web distribution pacts— including a five-way deal between Sony Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., Paramount Pictures and Universal Studios, as well as a joint venture between News Corp. and The Walt Disney Co. — one might think MovieFlix's streaming-only operation would find itself out in the cold.

But Mizrahi argues otherwise — he said the alliances don't prevent the studios from making other Internet-distribution deals. He believes MovieFlix service could become a good test for a viable streaming-video movie-distribution strategy.

"We like to call it a proof of concept," Mizrahi said. "Basically, we would like to show to the studios, to the investment community — to anyone out there, really — that there is actually a market out there for subscription; that there are a number of people out there that are willing to pay a monthly fee to watch full-length feature films delivered through an IP network."

But he acknowledges that MovieFlix hasn't negotiated directly with the major studios, so "it's still very early to say that anything can be forged between us."

MovieFlix will have to get in line with others who are seeking that content. There will likely be no shortage of video content aggregators seeking to beef up their libraries, and the studios are firmly in control of the floodgates, said Jupiter Research Inc. digital TV analyst Lydia Loizides.

Though studios are interested in cutting out the middleman and creating their own distribution services for newer movie releases, they may be willing to make deals to release older titles that have run their distribution course, Loizides said.

But she cautioned about paring down the available movie pool to less-than-fresh titles, and even those deals are possible only "if the studios decide they want to play ball, and if they can get their hands on anything that isn't already either exclusively tied or owned. Most of the libraries are owned."

Even if MovieFlix does pull down additional distribution deals, there's still the question of whether users will really watch the streaming video. Full-length movies may be MovieFlix's focus, but the users still aren't tuning in for a 120-minute film, according to the company's statistics. The average viewing time for a broadband user is 40 to 60 minutes, while narrowband users spend only five to 10 minutes on a flick.

Mizrahi said that doesn't mean viewers aren't watching any of the content from start to finish. But it does mean some are punching out after a few minutes, while others stop and start viewing.

Aside from building up its film base, MovieFlix also is expanding beyond its exclusive RealNetworks Inc.'s RealPlayer streaming-media format to include Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Media Player format.

At the time it started in 1998, RealNetworks offered what Mizrahi considered the best video player and distribution, so the company decided to go exclusively with the Real format. But the company is now talking to Microsoft and plans to add support for Windows Media within the next six months.

"It is a big undertaking and expense to encode in two separate formats," he acknowledged.

Overall, Mizrahi wants to grow MovieFlix at what he calls "an organic rate." Key to that will be an increase in the number of broadband users beyond what is now a small market.

"We are not the flashy dot-com of yesteryear that would throw these big parties, hire hundreds of employees to sit around and do nothing and basically drain the company's assets and resources," Mizrahi said. "We'd like to keep things relatively small and grow at a natural pace that fits the broadband economy.

"As soon as there is a critical mass of broadband users out there, we can afford to grow at a faster pace. But there is no reason to offer every format available on our Web site. There is no reason to hire hundreds of employees when the actual market out there is relatively small."

September 17, 2001 - Multichannel News

Back to top

Firm Looks To Capture Part of Internet Film Future - L.A. Business Journal

By: Darrell Satzman

Internet dreams die hard. As other content driven web businesses cash and burn, one local company is pushing forward with a plan to provide a variety of original and classic films, television and other entertainment through an Internet based subscription service.

And now, will be competing against the big boys. In a bid to avoid the sort of piracy problems that have plagued the music industry, a coalition of film studios announced last week they are developing a service to allow customers to download full length movies over the Internet.

To some, that spells the end for small players like MovieFlix, which almost certainly will be shut out from what promises to be the most desirable and valuable content in cyber space.

But founders, Opher Mizrahi and Robert Moskovits prefer to think positive thoughts. They say the studio venture - Sony Pictures Entertainment, Metro Goldwyn Mayer, Universal Studios, Paramount Pictures and Warner Bros. each own twenty percent of the service - is the best news they've heard in a while.

"When there is competition that means there is a market," said Mizrahi, who started MovieFlix with his U.C. Irvine buddy Moskovits in 1998. "Having the studios enter this space buoys the market and gives credibility to our business model."

Perhaps. But competition is a relative term. MovieFlix, which plucks films and television shows out of the public domain, accepts submissions from amateur filmmakers and has content deal with independent producers, will be hard pressed to compete for viewers with studios that are offering recent releases on the web.

Betting on Broadband What MovieFlix can do, Mizrahi and Moskovits insist, is create a profitable niche in a medium that promises to gain popularity as high speed broadband connections become more prevalent.

To that end, the company is moving from an ad based revenue model to one that relies primarily on subscription fees and syndication deals with Webcasters such as Yahoo Inc. and America Online. While much of the site's content will remain free, about a quarter of the most desirable offerings are available for $4.95 per month as part of its MovieFlix Plus service.

Unlike the studio service, which require users to spend twenty 20 or more downloading its movies, MovieFlix uses a streaming model that offers an instantaneous connection, albeit at the expense of some visual quality.

Since launching the premium service last month, MovieFlix, which says it has 400,000 subscribers and 2,200 titles, has signed up about a 1,000 people willing to pay five bucks a month. For that, they can stream such classics as "Metropolis" and "The 39 Steps," episodes of "Ozzie and Harriet," animated shorts and soft core erotica.

"The key for us is demonstrating that we can sign up a larger group of subscribers at a good rate," Mizrahi said.

Noting that only a tenth of American households have broadband connections, Sean Badding, vice president of the Carmel Group Research Company, said he sees opportunities for companies like MovieFlix.

"You're going to see a lot of independent producers take advantage of technology that is making it much easier to produce high quality films," Badding said. "The independent folks are going to ride the broadband wave just like the studios are doing."

But not everyone agrees. Forrester Research Inc. analyst Eric Scheirer said profitability was "wishful thinking." Ironically, MovieFlix and other content providers can suffer from their own popularity, Schierer said, because the more time subscribers spend online streaming material, the higher the company's broadband costs.

Moskovits acknowledged that broadband costs are a concern, but said that increased competition has dramatically lowered prices for both high speed internet service and information storage, an important consideration for a company that streams full-length films.

"Right now, the broadband providers are outbidding each other in a war to get customers," Moskovits said.

August 27 - September 2, 2001 - L.A. Business Journal

Back to top

Studios Download Internet Pic Deal - Variety Magazine

By: Marc Graser & Scott Hettrick

After months of negotiations, Sony has formalized an agreement with four studio partners on its Internet-based movie-on-demand service. Sony, Warner Bros., Universal, Paramount and MGM will be equal equity partners in the new joint venture, currently known as MovieFly but which has yet to be officially named. Service will launch early next year.

"We're all very vested in the existing distribution windows and relationships we have," Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment prexy Yair Landau said. "We're not launching to undermine any of that. We want to protect and sustain but also be in a position to recognize and address changes. This gives us a vehicle to respond to changes."

While other smaller Web ventures charge to distrib films online to Netizens, including Lions Gate's, and, the MovieFly announcement is the first time that multiple studios have teamed up on a movie distribution service since pay cable network Premiere was shut down in the early 1980s by the U.S. Justice Dept. over antitrust concerns.

Although high-speed Internet access is increasing through cable modems, satellite and high-speed telephone digital subscriber lines, the venture partners realize that the number of homes with broadband access is relatively small and profitability is years away. But they are positioning themselves for the future.

August 16, 2001 - Variety Magazine

Back to top